ADVT:

  Home   Astrology   Business   Indiafocus   Lifestyle   Movies   News   Parenting   Online Exam   Sports   Travel
  Sections
  News Archives
  Did you miss?
  Photo Gallery
  Spotlight
 War on Iraq
 US-Iraq standoff
 The Ayodhya crisis
  Public Opinion
  Write for Indiainfo
Home -> News-> World-> Full Story
It is too early to consider war on Iraq: Annan
Wednesday, January 15 2003 10:06 Hrs (IST)

Message Board
Will the US be justified in waging?

Post your views
United Nations: Iraq need not be attacked and can be disarmed peacefully if the international community maintains pressure on Saddam Hussein and inspectors continue their job aggressively, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said.

"I am both optimistic and hopeful that if we handle the situation right, and the pressure on the Iraqi leadership is maintained and the inspectors continue to work as aggressively as they are doing, we may be able to disarm Iraq peacefully, without need to resort to war," Annan said.

It is too early to consider any military offensive against Baghdad when the inspectors are "just getting up to full speed," he told reporters on January 14.

Annan said he was opposed to unilateral military action by the US and Britain against Iraq and favoured a second resolution by the Security Council authorising force if inspectors are unable to do their job.

"If disarmament were to succeed, that is the end of the story. Otherwise the Council will have to face up its responsibility," he said.

"Extremely worried" about possible impact of war on the Iraqi population, Annan said the UN was drawing up plans to meet the requirements of a large number of refugees needing assistance in case of military action against Iraq.

There was also some thinking about UN role in the post-conflict structures building, he said, adding currently the focus was on the humanitarian aspect.

The UN has experience in building post-conflict structures including in Afghanistan, Kosovo and East Timor he said, adding, however in Iraq's case "we are not assuming anything".

Though Iraqi co-operation with inspectors was not perfect, it was better than it used to be, Annan said, adding that the inspectors have found that there are major gaps in the Iraqi declaration on the status of its weapons of mass destruction.

The inspectors would prefer proactive co-operation from Baghdad, he said, adding this would be among the topics that are expected to come up when chief inspector Hans Blix and director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Mohamed al Baradei go the Baghdad late this week.

"If there are unforeseen developments that make the Council determine that there is a breach, then there should be serious consequences" but the situation has not reached that point, Annan said.

Asked whether US' military build-up has been helpful, Annan said there is "no doubt" that the American pressure was responsible for getting the inspectors back, something that the UN tried unsuccessfully for four years after they left Iraq in December 1998.

"Iraq agreed to allow them in four days after American President George W Bush called for their return in his speech to the UN General Assembly in September likes in cases of terrorism, describing it as a "murky area".

The pre-emptive policy, he said, is an extended doctrine of self-defence that is a "difficult issue", pointing out that there have been instances in history where the evidence to bolster a case of pre-emptive strikes was not needed.

PTI





US versus Iraq standoff



Home   News
Search Keywords