ADVT:

  Home   Astrology   Business   Indiafocus   Lifestyle   Movies   News   Parenting   Online Exam   Sports   Travel
  Sections
  News Archives
  Did you miss?
  Photo Gallery
  Spotlight
 War on Iraq
 US-Iraq standoff
 The Ayodhya crisis
  Public Opinion
  Write for Indiainfo
Home -> News-> World-> Full Story
Iraq can avoid war by disarming: Rumsfeld
Thursday, January 16 2003 12:04 Hrs (IST)

Message Board
Will the US be justified in waging?

Post your views
Washington: The United States has said war with Iraq is not inevitable and it could be prevented if President Saddam Hussein chooses to disarm.

"We continue to hope that he will change course. No one wants war. The choice between war and peace will not be made in Washington, or for that matter in New York, but in Baghdad," Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told reporters.

He made it clear again that in American eyes, it is Saddam's fault if United Nations inspectors do not find he is in breach of UN resolutions on weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

"The fact that inspectors have not yet come up with new evidence of Iraq's WMD could be evidence in and of itself of Iraq's non-co-operation. We do know Iraq has designed its programme in a way that they can proceed in an environment of inspections and that they are skilled at denial and deception.

"The President (George W Bush) has repeatedly made clear that the burden of proof is not on the United States, it is not on the UN or the international community to prove that Iraq has these weapons. The burden of proof is on the Iraqi regime to prove that it is disarming, and to show the inspectors where the weapons are," Rumsfeld said.

He said inspectors could only find what Iraq wanted them to see. "The only way to get at the truth is to get Iraqi scientists with their families outside Iraq and interview them."

The intelligence community of the US, Rumsfeld said, has assessed that Iraq has an active, on-going nuclear programme. They have assessed Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, he said.

"Iraqi people who have been involved in some of these programmes have told us that."

Why, Rumsfeld asked, would Iraq be buying out things that are critical to biological or chemical programmes or nuclear activities and trying to do it in secret?

He said if the US behaved as nations did in the 20th Century and reacted militarily only after being attacked with a biological or nuclear weapon, the price to be paid for waiting would be enormous.

When pointed out that some are accusing the US of taking the law into its own hands, Rumsfeld said the "right of self-defence is inherent in the sovereign state. That issue is clear and self-evident".

"He (Saddam) has killed a pile of people. He has attacked a number of nations. He has used chemical weapons on his own people and on his neighbours. And he has got a very effective denial and deception programme.

"And if someone is sitting here thinking, 'well, wouldn't it be nice if somebody walked up and handed you a chemical or biological weapon, or physical evidence that they are within 15 minutes of having a nuclear weapon', that would be wonderful. It isn't going to happen. It will only happen if he decides to do it," Rumsfeld said.

PTI





US versus Iraq standoff



Home   News
Search Keywords