ADVT:

  Home   Astrology   Business   Indiafocus   Lifestyle   Movies   News   Parenting   Online Exam   Sports   Travel
  Sections
  News Archives
  Did you miss?
  Photo Gallery
  Spotlight
 War on Iraq
 US-Iraq standoff
 The Ayodhya crisis
  Public Opinion
  Write for Indiainfo
Home -> News-> India-> Full Story
Oppositions creates furore in House on Ayodhya
Tuesday, February 18 2003 13:24 Hrs (IST)

Message Board
Should the Centre impose President's Rule in Uttar Pradesh to stall VHP's temple designs?

Post your views
New Delhi: An agitated Opposition on February 18 created a furore in Lok Sabha shortly after it assembled, demanding suspension of the Question Hour to discuss the Ayodhya issue, but Speaker Manohar Joshi asked the members to wait for a decision by the business advisory committee (BAC)on the matter.

Heated exchanges between treasury Benches and the Opposition occurred when Joshi allowed Opposition leaders like Mulayam Singh Yadav, Somnath Chatterjee and Shivraj Patil, who had moved the notices to suspend the Question Hour, to speak.

While demanding that the issue be discussed by suspending Question Hour, the Opposition leaders launched a scathing attack on the government, charging it with becoming "a party to divisive tendencies" by moving the Supreme Court when the "real issues" were yet to be decided.

As the House assembled, the Speaker announced he had received as many as 20 notices on Ayodhya issue, five on the flood situation, one by former Prime Minister H D Deve Gowda on the plight of sugarcane growers and one on misuse of Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA).

As he allowed the Samajwadi Party chief to speak on why should the Question Hour be suspended to discuss Ayodhya, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) members Vinay Katiyar and Kirti Azad said there was no reason to suspend the Question Hour.

Yadav said it was a serious matter, as the former chief justice of India justice J S Verma, had come out in the open to say that his verdict was being "distorted". He said BJP was playing politics with the issue and trying to foment communal trouble throughout the country.

Communist party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) leader Somnath Chatterjee said "Patriotism is not their (BJP's) monopoly. They are trying to divide the country and we are trying to keep it united." The statement caused turmoil in the House, with BJP members protesting it.

Chatterjee said the government had "suddenly" filed an application before the Supreme Court without consulting anybody. "They have done it too close to the 'dharam sansad' to be held on February 22," he said, leading to further protests from BJP members.

Stating that it was not a "routine matter", he said "It is a diabolical move to divide the country on the basis of religion and rouse passions of obscurantisms and fanaticism."

Chatterjee alleged the government's "intention was to hand over the disputed land to Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) without waiting for a decision on the main matter".

BJP's V K Malhotra said it was "unfortunate" that the Opposition was trying to stall moves to allow the proposed temple to be built on "undisputed land".

He said the Centre wanted to resolve the age-old tangle, but the Opposition did not want it to do so.

Shivraj Patil (Congress) charged the government with "becoming a party to divisive tendencies" and said "there was no other important issue (as Ayodhya) which divides the country".

The Speaker intervened to stop the regular bouts of interruptions and trading of charges between the ruling and the Opposition sides.

Seeking co-operation of all sides, he disallowed the notices on Ayodhya seeking to suspend the Question Hour, but said he wanted all issues to be discussed but it was for the BAC to decide the schedule for discussion.

PTI





The Ayodhya crisis



Home   News
Search Keywords