ADVT:

  Home   Astrology   Business   Indiafocus   Lifestyle   Movies   News   Parenting   Online Exam   Sports   Travel
  Sections
  News Archives
  Did you miss?
  Photo Gallery
  Spotlight
 War on Iraq
 US-Iraq standoff
 The Ayodhya crisis
  Public Opinion
  Write for Indiainfo
Home -> News-> India-> Full Story
Sinha lashes out at Pak, says accession of JK total
Saturday, March 15 2003 16:09 Hrs (IST)

Message Board
Is US using the Kashmir issue to try and get a permanent foothold in South Asia?

Post your views
Patiala: Asserting that the accession of Jammu and Kashmir was "total and irrevocable", External Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha on March 15 lashed out at Pakistan for demanding self-determination in the state, saying it was a crude attempt to bolster its agenda of "territorial aggrandizement" through terrorism against India.

"With the acceptance by India of the instrument of accession signed by the ruler of Jammu and Kashmir, the act of accession was complete. The state of J and K is, therefore, an integral and inalienable part of India," he said stressing the accession was total and irrevocable.

Pak is the aggressor and cannot have parity with India, says Yashwant Sinha Delivering his convocation address at the Punjabi University, Sinha elaborately countered certain oft-repeated assertions on Kashmir by Pakistan on the right to self-determination, UN resolutions and other issues.

He said India has always been willing to discuss the J and K issue with Pakistan. "But Pakistan seeks parity with India in terms of 'locus standi' in Kashmir. Pakistan is the aggressor. It cannot have parity with India."

Contending that Pakistan was in illegal occupation of a part of J and K, he said the only issue that remained to be resolved was the question pertaining to this and domination of the people of this area by the military establishment based in Rawalpindi.

"If only Pakistan would be willing to shed its hostility towards India and stop using terrorism as an instrument of national policy, there can still be a new dawn in our relationship," he observed.

Sinha said it was Pakistan, which had in October 1947, initially sent tribal invaders into J and K and then followed it up with regular troops.

Faced with an act of such blatant aggression, it was India, which decided in January 1948 to take the matter to the United Nations and its quest was to have the UN play its role in putting an end to this aggression, he said.

Contesting Pakistan's allegations that India has failed to implement UN Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP) resolution of August 13, 1948 and another of January 5, 1949, he said under them, India and Pakistan agreed to a three-step formula with a ceasefire, a truce agreement and plebiscite – to be implemented in "sequential order".

India made it clear that implementation of UN resolutions would be conditional upon Pakistan fulfilling the first two parts, which required that it withdrew troops and endeavoured to secure the withdrawal of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals from J and K.

The minister noted that India's acceptance of UNCIP resolutions was further subject to several conditions and assurances given by UNCIP.

These included that Pakistan would be excluded from all affairs of J and K, sovereignty of the J and K government over the entire territory of the state shall not be brought into question and territory occupied by Pakistan shall not be consolidated. Besides, it was stipulated that Pakistani troops would be withdrawn completely.

PTI





Kashmir is NOT negotiable



Home   News
Search Keywords