Home »
World » Full Story

| |
Can you call Iraq conflict a "War" at all?
By Nick Houvras
Thursday, August 28 2003 15:43 Hrs (IST)
There was never a real war fought in Iraq. Once the air space was secure over Iraq the war was over on
the ground. Little resistance and no Republican Guard with a million strong were encountered.
Quiet deals were made with Iraq's Generals that were never mentioned and proof of the hush up was
the 'Sadler road trip into Tikrit'.
An enormous military base fully stocked with tanks and personnel carriers and munitions and barracks
to house maybe half a million men completely deserted. This showed only once late at night and was
never mentioned again.
Why? Could the pentagon have told CNN to quash the story? If any deals had been made this is proof
of deals made. Why? Because any military man with half a brain would have leveled the entire site with
B-52's so that no resistance force could re-enter and use the equipment against our troops.
Why, after the war is supposedly over, haven't reporters returned to Tikrit to interview our troops there
and go through the military base? Can this base be used to supply resistance movement now ongoing in
Iraq? If the news agencies report the facts why hasn't this story been told.
A war can bring upwards of 10% casualties and if there were 250,000 coalition troops in Iraq that could
mean 25,000 casualties on our side alone. Now if our troops had faced a million man Republican Guard
Army on the ground their numbers would have been greater that 10% because we commanded the
airspace. The Iraq conflict was not a war, it was a military exercise.
A news agency that covers up the truth because the government tells it to, is nothing but a propaganda machine for the regime in power. Kinda like Saddam's outfit.
What do you think of this article ? Click here to post your views

Related Links
War on Iraq US versus Iraq standoff
|
 |
|
More News |
|
|
|