ADVT:

  Home   Astrology   Business   Indiafocus   Lifestyle   Movies   News   Parenting   Online Exam   Sports   Travel
Home -> News -> World -> Full Story

Not guilty verdict in Kanishka case is 2nd tragedy
Thursday, March 17 2005 10:49 Hrs (IST) - World Time -

Ajaib Singh Bagri and Ripudaman Singh Malik
Vancouver: Stunned by the acquittal of the main accused in the Kanishka bombing case, relatives of the victims who perished in the crash 20 years ago, termed the judgement as a "second tragedy" and demanded the Canadian Government convene a public inquiry.

A British Colombia Supreme Court judge yesterday (Mar 16, 2005) found both millionaire businessman Ripudaman Singh Malik and Kamloops mill worker Ajaib Singh Bagri not guilty in the Air India bombing which killed all 329 people on board off the Irish Coast in 1985.

The families said the 'not guilty' verdict yesterday meant that they were suffering yet another tragedy. "The verdict is a second tragedy."

"Justice was not served. There must be a public inquiry. Canadians deserve that, victims deserve that," Sushell Gupta, who lost his mother in the Air-India bombing, said after both the accused were acquitted.

"Our loved ones never came home," Gupta told reporters "This is a national story, a personal story. It is real, painful and permanent."

"This is not fair for those families whose loved ones are lost ... there should be a public inquiry. Every Canadian has the right to an answer. Something went wrong. Everyone's disappointed after 20 years," a spokesman for the Sikh Khalsa Diwan Society, Sarwan Singh Randhawa, told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC).

Public Safety Minister Anne McLellan would not commit to holding a public inquiry into the case. She said she would have to be convinced that there was further evidence that the 23-month trial did not turn up, to justify a public probe.

"It is way too soon for me or anyone else in the Government of Canada to say whether there would be any use of a public inquiry," McLellan told a throng of reporters in Edmonton yesterday.

She said that at this point, she could "not see any benefit" to holding a public inquiry.

While she would not commit to an inquiry, she admitted there are questions that will never be answered, adding, "I know that that is small comfort to the victims of the families."

A Canadian Government spokesman defended the case against the accused Air-India bombers. Geoffrey Gaul refused to rule out the possibility of an appeal. The prosecutors will review the judgement before deciding on an appeal, which must be filed within 30 days. "It's premature at this point to say what will transpire."

The prosecution had been handled in a "professional, responsible and principled" manner, he told reporters.

He offered his condolences to the families affected by the bombings and said that the focus of police and justice officials "never wavered."

He also noted the presumption-of-innocence tradition in Canadian law sets a high bar for the prosecution.

British Colombia Attorney general Geoff Plant said that he believes the justice system did what it set out to do, adding it is up to the federal Government to call a public inquiry.

Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin has not commented on the case.

Bagri, one of the two men acquitted, publicly expressed his sympathies for the victims' families after the verdict was handed down, saying he hoped the conclusion of the trial would begin the "healing process" within the Sikh community.

He also strongly maintained he was innocent of all charges.

Bagri stood with one of his lawyers, David Peck, in a crush of reporters, alongside his daughter, who read his statement aloud.

In his statement, read by his daughter outside the courthouse, Bagri said that the entire experience had been "very difficult" for himself and his family, but maintained his innocence.

His lawyer, Peck, said that his client might go back to work at the mill if he is able.

Meanwhile, Malik made his way through a crowd of reporters with several others after leaving the courthouse. He said nothing as he walked toward a waiting vehicle, although he had a slight smile on his face. He was then seen smiling and talking on a cellphone as he was driven away from the courthouse.

A statement released by the family of Malik, said he was innocent while expressing sadness for the victims.

Also, a statement posted on his website, said that the time Malik was in prison can never be returned to them. "On top of taking away our dad's freedom, the justice system has made us financial victims even when innocent."

"Our justice system is based on the principle of innocent until proven guilty. Please remember that a verdict of not guilty is a verdict of innocent," it added.

PTI

Related Stories
Shocking Kanishka trial verdict; accused acquitted
'Kanishka' 19-month trial ends; verdict in 2005
Kanishka trial: Prosecution winds up arguments








Opinion Poll
Is Raj Thackeray going overboard with his anti-North Indian stance?
Yes
No
Can't say
    

Results | Previous Results
More News
Pak court indicts 5 over Bhutto...
No further talks with China:...
Court permits student to switch...
Buddha raps UPA for faith in...
Fewer terror attacks under UPA:...
Delhi doctor denies link with...
478 voters, 510 votes in...
Clinton likely to accept top US...
Grenade attack kills Thai...
Pakistani minister's brother...
Badal inaugurates fard Kendra
Tony Blair has his audience in...
Mizo CM to contest from 2...
Eight killed in China hotel...
Despondency and hope in Jammu &...
1 killed 4 injured in a bomb...
Taxi drivers strike in southern...
Delhi doctor denies link with...
3 chain snatching incidents in...
US-led troops kill 14 militants
Somali pirates vow to resist...
Worth a click
  Sarees
Baby Clothes
Jewellery
Bluetooth Headsets
Health & Fitness

Search Keywords