Awami League may 'resist' Bangladesh elections Tuesday, January 02, 2007 12:48 [IST]
Dhaka: Awami League,
Bangladesh's
oldest political party, has vowed not to 'allow a walkover' to its rival
Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) should it decide to boycott the Jan 23
general elections.n such an event, the elections would be 'resisted', a Awami
League leader told The Daily Star Online.
"If we do not go to the polls that does not necessarily
mean giving a walkover to BNP. If we decide not to contest the elections, (we)
will resist it," Amir Hossain Amu said.
Political analysts, however, are of the view that this could
at best be a bargaining point with the caretaker government conducting the
polls and, more likely, a part of the campaign.
Awami League has gone too far into the elections to stay
away from them, English weekly Holiday, not
friendly disposed to the party or the alliance it leads, said in its year-end
analysis.
The League will announce its final electoral stance
Wednesday along with leaders of the 13 other parties that are part of its
alliance.
BNP chief Khaleda Zia, who leads the rival four-party alliance,
has expressed the hope for 'full participation', making it clear that this is
the time to plunge into the poll campaign and not for blockades.
While the Zia-led alliance is perceived way ahead in
campaign, the League has a long list of demands before it can participate.
These include President Iajuddin Ahmed, who doubles as chief
advisor of the caretaker government, making way for someone neutral, removal of
one of the three election commissioners and restraining the armed forces from
aiding civilian authority.
The League received a setback when its new ally, former
president H.M. Ershad, was debarred from contesting elections after being
convicted in a corruption case. His Jatiya Party has said it would boycott the
polls.
The League says much campaign time was lost due to political
bickering and protests against the Government and wants the poll date
postponed.
The constitution stipulates polls within 90 days of the
caretaker government taking office, a period that ends on Jan 25.
Any change would require an amendment to the constitution
for which there is no parliament at the moment.
Reminded of the constitutional requirement to hold elections
within a 90-day period after the parliament dissolves, Amu said, "We
cannot be a scapegoat in the name of constitution; the constitution has been
changed many times before." |