BNP rejects move on presidential reference on polls Monday, January 08, 2007 06:20 [IST]
Dhaka: The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), deep
into its campaign as head of a four-party alliance, has rejected proposals for
a presidential reference to the Supreme Court to have the general elections
postponed to accommodate the Awami League-led grouping.
The BNP reaction late Sunday was on expected lines, analysts
said, as the issue was foreclosed a day earlier by President Iajuddin Ahmed,
also chief advisor of the caretaker government conducting the polls due Jan 22.
"At the present stage of the elections, there is no
scope for sending a reference to court," the president said in a
statement.
After Ahmed's 5,000-word statement, three advisers to the
caretaker government met leaders of the BNP-led alliance Sunday afternoon.
By the end of the day, a strong rejection came from BNP
secretary general Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan.
Article 106 of the constitution provides for a presidential
reference to the apex court to seek change in the poll schedule, allowing an
election postponement beyond the 90-day tenure of the caretaker government.
That period, at present, ends Jan 25.
Experts say this is the only recourse Ahmed can take in the
absence of the National Assembly that could amend the statute.
The move came even as a 'blockade' by the Awami League-led
'grand alliance' Sunday witnessed numerous violent incidents and clashes, both
among political workers and between protestors and law-keeping agencies.
The media Monday reported several incidents of use of rubber
bullets and teargas to quell protesting workers. Many were injured, but no
casualties have been reported.
The armed forces, deployed several weeks before the polling
day by Ahmed, have sought "more powers" beyond what the constitution
provides to be able to "arrest anyone from any place" to maintain law
and order in and around polling stations, specifically to keep away those
opposing the elections, The Daily Star reported.
Analysts said the move is bound to cause further
provocations among the parties campaigning against the polls. They point to the
use of the armed forces during the 2001 polls and later when political
opponents and religious minorities were targeted.
|