ADVT:

  Home   Astrology   Business   Indiafocus   Lifestyle   Movies   News   Parenting   Online Exam   Sports   Travel

HomeWorldEurope  
  
More News
Mamta defends hefty salaries
A rare love story!
Lok Sabha adjourned over...
Liberhan report in this...
China coal mine blast: 104...
China mine blast death toll 104
Govt to help obese woman in...
Red alert at Guj Kandla oil...
Three Mile Island Nuke plant...
Who should I deal with in Pak?:...
LeT's Google Earth link to...
Who should I deal with in Pak?:...
Four held for misbehaving with...
20 arrested in Orissa for...
No fear of ties suffering under...
Pak not serious on Mumbai...
Assam twin blast toll rises to...
Open gateways to dual use...
Dalai Lama doesn't want to...
Mumbaikars don't about security
Sikh groups seek justice for...


 
Howard against withdrawal of forces
Thursday, March 22, 2007 15:18 [IST]
PTI

howardMelbourne: "Early withdrawal of coalition forces from Iraq would lead to disastrous strategic and humanitarian consequences and position Baghdad as a platform for global terror," said John Howard Australian Prime Minister.

Four years after the coalition went to war in Iraq, Howard mounted a strong defence of Australia's continued military presence in the country and asked the international community to stay engaged at the 'hard end' of the struggle.

He appealed to Australians to consider the high stakes in Iraq and to remember that, notwithstanding a strong economy, a near record stock market and low unemployment, this is a time of war.

"The stakes are extraordinarily high - for Iraq, for the wider Middle East, for American power and prestige and, ultimately, for our region and our own national security," Howard told the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in Canberra.

"I believe strongly that to signal our departure now would be against Australia's national interest," he said and attacked opposition labor party leader Kevin Rudd, saying he had adopted a fundamentally flawed position on Iraq that the war-torn country could achieve reconciliation without the security provided by coalition forces.

"Why is it right that Australia and its allies prevail in Afghanistan but fail in Iraq? Why is it approved for Iraq to become a safe haven for global terror but not Afghanistan," Howard said.

 "Labor supports setting a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq irrespective of the situation on the ground. Our position could not be more sharply different," he said.


Add To

digg.com

del.icio.us

stumbleupon.com

My Yahoo

reditt.com

newsvine.com

fark.com
 Post Your Feedback   
Name
Email ID
Comments
 Other Features
News today
Screen Sever
Gallery
WallPaper
Print this page
Mail this page
Archives