ADVT:

  Home   Astrology   Business   Indiafocus   Lifestyle   Movies   News   Parenting   Online Exam   Sports   Travel

News HomeWorldAmerica
US Supreme Court backs lethal injection executions
Thursday, April 17, 2008 09:09 [IST]

Washington: The US Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the right of states to lethally inject prisoners sentenced to death, opening the door for states to resume the practice.

There had been a virtual nationwide moratorium on executions since the Supreme Court in September agreed to to hear the case of two inmates in Kentucky who argued lethal injections violated a constitutional clause against "cruel and unusual punishment".

But the nation's high court concluded that while use of the death penalty itself might be debatable, the bench could not rule lethal injections violated the Constitution. "A method of execution violates the Eighth Amendment only if it is deliberately designed to inflict pain," Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion of the court's 7-2 decision.

The two prisoners convicted of murder argued any errors in the administration of the cocktail of lethal poison could cause severe pain during death. The Supreme Court's decision was announced just as Pope Benedict XVI was heading for his first visit to the White House. Benedict is adamantly opposed to the death penalty and has raised his objections during a previous meeting with President George W Bush, whose state of Texas leads the nation in executions.

During an execution, a prisoner is first injected with a sedative to render the subject unconscious before the deadly and painful substances of pancuronium bromide and potassium chloride follow to paralyse and kill. The Kentucky inmates argued that a mistake in injecting the sedative sodium thiopental means the prisoner would experience intense pain while dying.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in her dissent, said there was no guarantee the prisoner would be adequately immune to pain. "I would not dispose of the case so swiftly given the character of the risk at stake," Ginsburg wrote. The two prisoners did not argue against the death penalty but instead were trying to force the state of Kentucky to change its procedures.

The Supreme Court also heard arguments on Wednesday over a state's right to sentence people to death for child rape. There are currently two people on death row for raping a child without killing their victim.


Source : IANS

Add To

digg.com

del.icio.us

stumbleupon.com

My Yahoo

reditt.com

newsvine.com

fark.com
 Post Your Feedback   
Name
Email ID
Comments
 Other Features
News today
Screen Sever
Gallery
WallPaper
Print this page
Mail this page
Archives


  
More News
Mumbaikars don't about security
Sikh groups seek justice for...
India to promote tourism in...
Pak claims India supports...
Droopy Santa to get a facelift!
Twin blasts in Assam kill five
Twin blasts rocks Assam, five...
Shop till you drop... from home
Is it Democracy or Monocracy?
Terror, part of Paks state...
Omar not in Pak?
BREAKING NEWS: Shiv Sena...
Probe ordered into MP jailbreak
LeT getting stronger and...
Parliament stalled over...
Govt to hold meeting sugarcane...
Clinton wants to keep away from...
Suspected Maoists derail train
DTC launches low-floor buses on...
Lashkar threat to Goa film...
Forget regionalism, unite as...