ADVT:

  Home   Astrology   Business   Indiafocus   Lifestyle   Movies   News   Parenting   Online Exam   Sports   Travel

News HomeIndiaNational
Can murder convicts be sentenced to 'rigorous' life imprisonment?
Thursday, December 18, 2008 20:15 [IST]

New Delhi: A murder convict sentenced to rigorous life imprisonment has approached the Supreme Court of India asking whether courts at all are empowered to make his stay in jail harsh as well.

The case will be taken up for hearing Friday. The convict contends the courts cannot make his life sentence additionally rigorous because section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which provides for punishment to murder convicts, does not provide laborious imprisonment at all. The contention has been raised by Balchandra Parmanand Panchal, undergoing rigorous life imprisonment in a Kutch jail in Gujarat. He was convicted along with one of his two sons on charges of murdering a neighbour. The second son, who too faced the trial, however, was acquitted. The murder was committed in August 1999. A Kutch session court sentenced him to jail for life in June 2001 and the Gujarat High Court upheld his conviction and the sentence in June 2008.

Panchal has come to the apex court challenging the Gujarat High Court ruling. "Whoever commits murder shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine," pointed out Panchal in petition to the apex court, quoting section 302. Advocate Pandit Parmanand Katara told IANS that the courts can even send his client to gallows or simply sentence him to life in jail, but cannot make his life sentence additionally rigorous. Katara said Panchal's petition will be taken up for hearing Friday by an apex court bench headed by Justice Tarun Chatterjee for the first time.

The petition points out that the Indian Penal Code, originally enacted in 1860 provided for transportation for life to a murder convict to "Kala Pani" or Port Blair, the capital of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. But after India's independence, section 302 of the IPC was amended in 1956,when the phrase "transportation for life" was changed to imprisonment for life. The petition argues that it was not even the intention of the legislature or parliament to make the jail term of the murder convicts additionally strenuous or rigorous. "Had it been so, the parliament, while amending section 302 of the IPC, would have also inserted the word rigorous in the provision," said Katara.


Source : IANS

Add To

digg.com

del.icio.us

stumbleupon.com

My Yahoo

reditt.com

newsvine.com

fark.com
 Post Your Feedback   
Name
Email ID
Comments
 Other Features
News today
Screen Sever
Gallery
WallPaper
Print this page
Mail this page
Archives


  
More News
Mamta defends hefty salaries
A rare love story!
Lok Sabha adjourned over...
Liberhan report in this...
China coal mine blast: 104...
China mine blast death toll 104
Govt to help obese woman in...
Red alert at Guj Kandla oil...
Three Mile Island Nuke plant...
Who should I deal with in Pak?:...
LeT's Google Earth link to...
Who should I deal with in Pak?:...
Four held for misbehaving with...
20 arrested in Orissa for...
No fear of ties suffering under...
Pak not serious on Mumbai...
Assam twin blast toll rises to...
Open gateways to dual use...
Dalai Lama doesn't want to...
Mumbaikars don't about security
Sikh groups seek justice for...