ADVT:

  Home   Astrology   Business   Indiafocus   Lifestyle   Movies   News   Parenting   Online Exam   Sports   Travel


News HomeIndiaNorth
Authority to hear green cases headless
Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:21 [IST]

New Delhi: Set up in 1997 to lessen the increasing burden of environment-related public interest petitions on the judicial system, the National Environment Appellate Authority (NEAA) has been without a head for over eight years.

There is no website or address through which people can access the authority with their green grievances.

Despite several directives by the Delhi High Court, the latest being last month, the central government has failed to appoint any retired apex court judge or former chief justice of the high court to serve as NEAA chairman since 2000.

"You did not find a judge for eight years? Remarkable...Who else can be appointed as chairperson in place of a retired chief justice of the high court or a retired Supreme Court judge?" a bench headed by Chief Justice Ajit Prakash Shah and Justice S. Muralidhar told the government counsel in December.

In 2005, following a public interest petition, the court had asked the government to clear proposals related to the appointment of chairman as well as other technical members and reconstitute the authority within 45 days. But nothing has happened.

The government, which has been slammed by the court on several occasions for its outlandish and lackadaisical approach, comes up with excuses at every hearing.

The court was informed by the centre in October last year that the ministry of environment had been unable to get hold of the phone numbers of retired chief justices of the Delhi High Court or even Supreme Court judges in order to contact them!

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) P.P. Malhotra during the December hearing submitted that no judge was coming forward to the accept the post.

But the bench said: "If you were serious about the issue, you could have amended the act," the bench said referring to the act under which the NEAA was set up.

The bench also said the remuneration fixed by the government for the post did not match the amount for those of judicial officer rank.

The bench reserved its judgment and said, "We will decide the perks and salary as per law."

As far as other members of the NEAA was concerned, counsel appearing for the petitioner informed the court that three of those appointed were not technical experts.

"The three members are Indian Forest Service (IFS) officials although they are not technically sound and have no expertise in matters concerning environmental clearances," counsel said.

Counsel also mentioned that in the absence of a chairman, there is no mechanism to approach the authority. "There is no mechanism...No website, no address, people do not have knowledge about the authority," he said.

 


Source : ians

Add To

digg.com

del.icio.us

stumbleupon.com

My Yahoo

reditt.com

newsvine.com

fark.com
 Post Your Feedback   
Name
Email ID
Comments
 Other Features
News today
Screen Sever
Gallery
WallPaper
Print this page
Mail this page
Archives


  
More News
Vajpayee was not investigated,...
FICCI signs agreements with...
Eunuchs too have a right to...
Manmohan Singh asks Pakistan...
Flag march to remember 26/11...
Pregnant woman paraded naked,...
Mamta defends hefty salaries
A rare love story!
Lok Sabha adjourned over...
Liberhan report in this...
China coal mine blast: 104...
China mine blast death toll 104
Govt to help obese woman in...
Red alert at Guj Kandla oil...
Three Mile Island Nuke plant...
Who should I deal with in Pak?:...
LeT's Google Earth link to...
Who should I deal with in Pak?:...
Four held for misbehaving with...
20 arrested in Orissa for...
No fear of ties suffering under...